Spend without growth
Test whether new campaigns shifted attribution or added genuinely incremental traffic and orders.

Amazon Ad Cannibalization Analysis
Check overlap first, then diagnose exposure, click, conversion, and economics in causal order from evidence you provide.
Try an example task
Share the marketplace, comparison windows, campaign goals, search-term, ASIN, audience, placement, variant, funnel, organic, and economics evidence. The Agent first tests whether campaigns are competing for the same demand.
Only after overlap is addressed does it trace missing exposure, clicks, conversion, or profit. The result separates facts, causal hypotheses, unknowns, actions, review points, and stop conditions without inventing incrementality.
Test whether new campaigns shifted attribution or added genuinely incremental traffic and orders.
Find duplicated search terms, ASINs, audiences, placements, variants, and objectives.
Prioritize exposure, click, conversion, or economics causes after traffic boundaries are clear.
Explain why spend rose but total orders did not

Align dates, attribution, product state, promotions, inventory, and total-account measures.
Check duplicated traffic, objectives, variants, and attribution before treating higher activity as incremental demand.
Diagnose exposure, click, conversion, and economics one branch at a time with explicit evidence.

It means campaigns may compete for or reattribute existing traffic and orders instead of creating additional demand.
If the same traffic is split across campaigns, changing bids, images, and price at once hides the actual cause and makes results harder to interpret.
Usually not by itself. It can identify supporting and conflicting evidence, but missing experiment or attribution evidence remains unknown.
Choose an example or describe your own task to get a structured result.